We are using the Reviewer's evaluation with plant workers, these are learners that do not have an easy access to a device for online content.
We would like the worker to give his/her own appreciation of his/her performance so that in the end, the reviewer can see the perception of the worker compared to what he/she (the reviewer) observed.
The way we imagine this is that the foreman would open the review page for the given learner, and be able to select between the Auto-evaluation page or the Reviewer's page.
If the auto-evaluation page is open, the foreman would let the learner use the tablet so he/she can auto-rate his recent actions, using the same criteria as the reviewer. For the learner, he/she could only enter the evaluation with the criteria of the step (rating, Yes/No or comment), the learner would not be able to write additional comments.
If the reviewer page is selected, then it's the usual reviewer experience.
Thank you for taking the time to share your idea with us, we truly appreciate your input and the thought you put into improving our platform.
While we haven’t yet built learner self-review into the observation checklist, our skills product does include a self-review concept. However, the two-step process you’re referring to isn’t something we currently support. This is an area we’ve hoped to explore, but unfortunately, it doesn’t fit into our roadmap for this year.
That said, your idea is valuable, and we’ve added it to our repository. We will revisit it as we continue evaluating improvements to the reviewer’s evaluation process.
Your feedback plays a key role in shaping our platform, and we truly appreciate your contribution. Please keep sharing your ideas, we’re listening!